Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘SEO’

Had a bit of an SEO-advice column today and figured I’d might as well scribble everything down in a blog post. Hopefully it’s of help to someone :)

Imagine you’re creating a site or revamping an old one. This is e the basic basics you simply have to know and do.

What is your bottom line?
The main reason for your site, what you want to accomplish. This is your keyword starting point.
For our examples we’ll use: Sharing my love for clothes (after all, I think about them every day anyway)

Build your keyword list
This is not an absolute must, but I strongly recommend it. For one you will exhaust all areas you might want to write about, and you’ll start to see patterns that can be helpful in organizing the site. A second up-side is you’ll have a long list to pick from once you start writing the content – always good when your inspiration won’t show up on time.
For our example. Clothes is the bottom line keyword. From there you go to dresses, skirts, jackets, t-shirts etc. Dresses become anything from 50′s style dress to cocktail dress and Kitty Foyles

Meta-title tag
The main keyword(s) of each page should be in the title tag.
You have 65 characters to play with, put the most important words first (but make it readable!)
Each page should have a unique title tag!
Example: “Kitty Foyle dress findings – Dolly’s Dresses” (Let’s face it, you’ll wanna stick your brand in there somewhere)

Meta description tag
Google (and any other search engine) shows a short description of each page in the SERPs (Search Engine Result Page). It’s not necessary to write one, Google will pick something from the page if you don’t – but it’s always nice to choose the wording if you can. You have about 150 characters.
Example: Searching for beautiful dresses, especially the Kitty Foyle type, is hard work. Now I think I’ve finally found one and I’ll like to give you the inside tips on finding your own.”

H1 Title
The first title in your actual text is the one that Google sees as most important. Its wording should be close to the Meta title, but it doesn’t have to be the same – maybe you want to make this a bit longer. You can also use title with the tags h2, h3 etc, but that mainly for the benefit of the reader.
Example: “How to find the perfect Kitty Foyle dress”

Content
Content, content, content is one of the favorite sayings of SEO. This basically means, people like to read good content, Google likes updated content, 1 page = 1 potential hit in SERPs (500 pages= 500 potential hits), and other websites are more likely to link to qualitative content.
Example: I’ll aim to post a minimum of 2 articles per week. I’ll make it at least 300-400 words. I’ll also use different channels to spread it, hoping someone likes it enough to link to it.

Pictures and Alt-tags
Pictures are nice for the reader, that’s the bottom line. However, search engines can’t see, therefore you need to provide and alternative text that describes the picture. This is of course open to interpretation.
Example: Picture of a dress could be “Dress 1″ or “Black White Kitty Foyle dress”

Meta keywords
Basically, don’t bother with it. Google doesn’t care, Yahoo might, but no users care about Yahoo :) Also it’s a dead give-away for your competition, at least let them read through the site in search of the good stuff!

The URL
both users and Google will more easily understand http://www.site.com/this-is-my-post than http://www.site.com/p134 or the even more hideous versions available. Just remember that :) Also, I would say avoid .htm .aspx etc at the end of a URL – not everyone would agree, but frankly, if the user ends up on a webpage, I don’t see the point for it. (.pdf has it’s advantages)

Read Full Post »

Anyone loves celebrity gossip right? Wrong. But anyone likes to think/read/hear about people they see as celebrities!

With fame comes perks, but more so responsibility and the “right” for people to have an opinion about your personality. I’m not applauding either, I’m just calling it the way I see it.

Andy Warhol coined the “15 minutes of fame” expression, something that people tend to call “15 seconds” nowadays. Regardless, god knows we’re close to actually getting our 15 minutes. Not only because the entertainment industry is bigger than ever – but because we’re constantly creating small duck ponds where people can know and admire each other.

Twitter is one pond – given, it’s quickly being flooded – and there is actually people that are part of the “twitterati”. Some of them are famous for other reasons (and might even be seen as a twitterati for the wrong reasons), but many of them are a force to be reckoned with on Twitter, and much because of Twitter.

I’ll give you some examples from the areas were I move – SEO, SEM, web analytics, social media marketing etc. Avinash Kaushik is one of my “idols”. He’s has a lot of smart things to say, is very credible and in many ways a person to admire. Have you heard of him? (chance are you have, after all, you’re reading my blog ;-) ) And Peter Cashmore at Mashable? Or Anna Talerico? I dare say, none of these people are celebrities – but all of them are pond-celebrities. Known and reputable in their area of expertise, by people that want to be in their business, and people that want to make money of that business ;) If you know them, that probably means they have a stake in your success. Either you want to employ them, be employed by them, learn something from them or sell something to them. It’s not a matter of me being cynical – it’s a matter of networking!

You’re nothing without a network, and through connected people you have a good chance of expanding your own.

Compare that to being a  a pop musician, TV personality, fashion blogger etc – you might have tens of thousands of readers/viewers every day – most of them with an opinion of you, all of them a part of your income, but non of them with a stake in your success. No reason for them to reveal their identity, and so easy for them to air their discontent with you (or more probably, themselves).

Personally, I think haters are a sign of celebrity status. And although to some it might be alluring to be know by “everyone”. Given the real perks (acknowledgment,  discussions, though leadership, job offers…) I would pick being a pond-celebrity any day! The only risk is, if you’re prone to drama – remember not to poop in you own pond ;)

So, what do you think?! Are there other important distinctions in celebrity status? Does the “normal” kind of celebrity trump the pond-celebrity in any way? Might there even be a reason to NOT strive for acknowledgment from “fans”?

Read Full Post »

Ok, so I read Avinash Kaushiks tweet yesterday, about Market Motives Master Certification Finals. Didn’t know what to expect, but I signed up. Turned out it was a real test to pass the exam. Poor people! They had hundreds of ppl listening to their every word! Surprisingly most of them sounded calm!

More surprisingly – not too many surprises for me! I’m actually feeling good about my self today! The PR part was brand new though – but intriguing!

For instance:
I never thought of optimizing the press release itself – I just figured they were part of the whole optimazation.
But Jennifer Day described the 5-step process of optimization process very good. (At least I think so, don’t know about the examinators)
1. Do your keyword research – What phrases will your target audience look for.
2. Include these words/phrases in headline, first sentenses and then spread out through the article.
3. Include relevant links to see who came from the press release
4. Use a distribution service
5. Measure the outputs; mentionings, reads, blogposts etc.

Also, Google only show pictures in press releases once (per month)! So, no point in trying to show your logo next to every one – Google won’t fall for that, apperently.

And make sure your target URL are in both text and html-link – you don’t ppl to miss out on the whole point of the press release, right...

No question the big hurdle for PR ppl seems to be pitching their products greatness to bloggers! :)

The SEO-part was more easily understood for me – thank god! ;)
The candidates mentioned things like titel tags, focusing on the goal of the website (Thanks to Avinash, I’m already sold on that), keeping Flash of the homepage, leaving the tracking code at the end of the code (thanks again, Avinash!), importance of sitemaps etc.

I also had some aha-experiences;
* Text links are good – (I just need to not think about how they look…)
* Tables are no good – (Apparently, who knew, I’ve never even thought about them)
* Negative keywords in PPC are important – (I have to work on that one, for sure!)
* I am a writer! or what do you think? ;-) (at least I hope so, since I find that easier than the technical stuff regarding SEO)
* PR ppl use Technocrati (or do you disagree? I’m just fishing here, really!)
*Meta keywords aren’t all that good – (Darn, I like that part!)

Regarding META keywords Rand Fishkin said something I never thought about – It provides your competition with competitive intelligence! However it is good for internal search and although only 1 of the big search engines index it – it is seen as best practice by many.

One thing I’m still not clear on is however Googles Traffic Estimator is a good thing or not. There was talking about the numbers being inflated, all of them or just some of them – but I never got the examinators view. Guess I’ll have to take the course now ;-)

Curious about Market Motive Certified Internet Marketing Consultants ?

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.